Performance feature

Calibration

Fair, consistent review ratings, agreed before results are shared.

TalentJam calibration session for one manager's reviews: each participant's responses by measure and aggregated performance rating, with the self-assessment beneath, one override shown with the original struck through, and two rows locked as calibrated
Calibration: each person's aggregated rating reviewed side by side, with overrides that keep the original visible. Illustrative example.
  • Calibration sessions within a review cycle, each with its own participants, measures and access list
  • Each person's aggregated rating, the average of all review inputs, reviewed and adjusted by the group to correct for reviewer bias, including simple optimism or pessimism
  • Every override keeps the original score visible, with the skill-by-skill breakdown behind the average
  • Discussion comments, exclusions with a documented reason, and rows locked once agreed
Part of Performance.
Every figure resolves to the same framework the rest of the platform uses, so this feature's output is readable by a review, a pathway or a workforce plan without reconciliation.
See the Performance module →
TalentJam calibration Details view for Leo Harris: his reporting line and lock control, general information, the Potential measures, and the Performance in role breakdown showing each skill's reviewer rating with his self-rating beneath, and the overridden score of 2.31 with the original 1.94 struck through
Details: the skill-by-skill breakdown behind an average, which is what makes an override defensible in the room. Illustrative example.

Alongside this

See it on your own data

A 45-minute walkthrough using your roles, your frameworks and your questions.

Last updated 24 September 2026