Performance feature

Reviews & 360 feedback

Structured review cycles with evidence, not blank boxes.

TalentJam direct report evaluation: the manager scores Emily Stewart's skills 1 to 3 with her self-assessment beneath each, while the additional feedback drawer shows a peer's strengths and areas of opportunity, and a private promotion question sits below — Reviewing with context: a peer's strengths and opportunities beside the manager's own scoring. Illustrative example.

Self, manager and peer reviews in a cycle or at any time, with peers nominated and approved
Skills drawn from each person's position, rated on your own response scale
Reviewers see what others said, in context, while they write
Sharing decided per question set, including private sets the reviewee never sees

Part of Performance.
Every figure resolves to the same framework the rest of the platform uses, so this feature's output is readable by a review, a pathway or a workforce plan without reconciliation.

See the Performance module →

TalentJam self review for Emily Stewart: her self review and peer reviews in the rail, skills rated 1 to 3 with answered items ticked, strengths, opportunities and general feedback, and the additional feedback panel awaiting a peer's responses — The same cycle from the other side: a self review, with peer reviews to give alongside it. Illustrative example.

Alongside this

CalibrationFair, consistent review ratings, agreed before results are shared.Goals & OKRsLine of sight from individual goals to organisational strategy.Personal development plansDevelopment plans that name the skill and the level being worked towards.Performance analyticsEvery response summarised, and every summary traceable to its responses.

See it on your own data

A 45-minute walkthrough using your roles, your frameworks and your questions.

Book a demo How the service works →